Journal of Sustainable Economies

ISSN:3067-6118

Journal Insights | Publishing Model: Platinum Open Access | APC: Waived by the Publisher

Editor-in-Chief View Editorial Board

Seyed Alireza Athari

On this Page

Editorial Policies

Manuscript Submission and Peer-review Process

The Journal of Sustainable Economies (JSE) welcomes submission of unsolicited as well as invited manuscripts. The journal may also call for manuscripts related to its aim and scope as part of a special issue. All submissions are subject to initial screening by the Editor-in-Chief (EIC). The initial screening process focuses on the fit of the manuscript's topic with the focus of JSE. Lack of fit, as well as lack of scientific rigor or very unprofessional writing, may also lead to a desk rejection by the EIC. If the EIC rejects a manuscript, a detailed letter will be sent to the author(s) explaining the reasons for this action.

Following initial screening, the EIC will assign two reviewers who have expertise in the manuscript's content area. Reviewers will assess the manuscript's theoretical basis, appropriate use of methods (if empirical methods are used), discussion of implications, and overall contribution to the field of sustainable marketing. To facilitate the review process, author(s) are asked to provide two or three potential peer reviewers, who are not collaborators, but who are familiar with the manuscript's content area. There is no guarantee that the names submitted by the author(s) will be selected. The peer-review process usually takes four to six weeks.

Reviews are double-blind. That is, JSE maintains the anonymity of the author(s) as well as the peer reviewers. If there is a potential conflict of interest affecting the ability of peer reviewers to provide an unbiased review of the manuscript, peer reviewers must disclose the conflict of interest (see Conflicts of Interest Policy). The main goal of the peer review process is to add scientific value to the manuscript. Reviewers are required to submit their comments in a document that includes notes for the editor, and specific recommendations for the author(s).

Author(s) are asked to include detailed responses to the reviewers' recommendations in "Notes to Reviewers." Please copy, paste, and number reviewer recommendations into "Notes to Reviewers" and then provide explanations of changes made or reasons for not making changes to the original manuscript. Please include both a clean copy and a "track changes" copy upon submission of revisions.

The manuscript may be accepted at any stage of the submission and review process. Decisions to reject, revise, or accept are made based on reviewer recommendations and the EIC's evaluation. In case of rejection, author(s) have the right to submit an appeal outlining reasons for believing that reviewers and/or the EIC have erred in rejecting the paper. The reasons should be compelling, detailed, and specific. The EIC will consider the appeal and determine whether resubmission to the originally assigned reviewers or to additional, new reviewers is warranted.

What Happens After Submitting a Manuscript?

The Journal of Sustainable Economies uses Manuscript Manager (MM) to manage the peer-review process. Here's an overview of the steps your manuscript will follow:

  1. Initial Check: The editorial office team will first conduct a technical review of your manuscript, focusing on aspects such as format, anonymity, similarity score, etc. Should any issues be identified, the manuscript will be returned to you for necessary revisions. At this stage, the status in MM will be "With Editorial Office." If the manuscript is returned to you, the status will change to "Suspended".
  2. Assignment to Editor: Your manuscript will be assigned to the journal's Editor. At this stage, the status in MM will be "With Editor."
  3. Potential Rejection: In some cases, the Editor may determine that your manuscript does not meet the journal's aims or scope and should not be considered further. In such instances, you will be promptly notified of the rejection and may receive recommendations for alternative journals.
  4. Peer Review: If your manuscript aligns with the scope and criteria of the Journal of Sustainable Economies, the Editor will select and contact reviewers who are experts in the field. Please note that peer review is a voluntary process and may take some time. The Editor will actively follow up with reviewers to ensure timely responses. During this period, the status will be "In Review."
  5. Decision: Once the Editor has received the requisite number of reviews, the status will change to "Decision Pending". The manuscript may receive one of the following decisions:

4.1. Reject: The manuscript is not suitable for the journal, either due to lack of alignment with the journal's scope or insufficient quality. It will not be considered further.

4.2. Reject with Resubmission: The manuscript is not accepted in its current form but shows potential. Authors are encouraged to make substantial revisions and resubmit as a new submission.

4.3. Major Revision: Significant changes are required for the manuscript to be reconsidered. Authors must address substantial feedback before resubmission.

4.4. Minor Revision: The manuscript is generally well-received, but minor adjustments are needed. Authors should make the necessary revisions and resubmit.

4.5. Conditional Acceptance: The manuscript is nearly ready for publication, pending minor final adjustments. Once these are made to the satisfaction of the Editor, it will be accepted.

4.6. Accept: The manuscript meets all criteria and will be published as is or with minimal copyediting.

Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest

JSE's disclosure and conflict of interest policy is designed to ensure that author(s)' manuscript content, as well as external reviewers' evaluations of such manuscripts, are not biased by certain pre-existing relationships. In this regard, author(s) must explicitly identify any potential conflicts (such as personal relationships or financial dependencies that may affect their actions). Likewise, external reviewers must disclose all conflicts of interest and recuse themselves from reviewing a given manuscript if they believe a conflict may exist, e.g., knowledge of one or more of the authors based on a prior professional relationship. If a conflict of interest is declared, the EIC will judge whether the reviewer is eligible to conduct the review.

Upon initial submission, author(s) are asked to disclose sources of funding. Author(s) must identify all affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity that has a financial interest or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. Examples of financial dependency include: employment, advisory, fees, ownership of shares or financial options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending and royalties. This list is not exclusive. Relevant conflicts of interest (or lack thereof) must be made public in the "Disclosure" section of the manuscript for all listed authors.

Citation Ethics and Prevention of Citation Manipulation

The Journal of Sustainable Economies (JSE) is committed to upholding the highest standards of academic integrity and ethical publishing. Citations must be included solely to acknowledge relevant prior work and to support the theoretical, methodological, and empirical foundations of a manuscript.

The following practices are considered unethical and are not permitted:

  • Excessive self-citation by authors that is not clearly justified by the manuscript's content.
  • Targeted citation of a specific individual, group of authors, institution, or journal without clear scholarly relevance.
  • Citation stacking or coordinated citation practices intended to artificially inflate citation metrics.
  • Adding citations for strategic, promotional, or metric-related purposes rather than for genuine academic contribution.
  • Coercive citation practices by reviewers or editors, including requests to add irrelevant citations.

Editors and reviewers are instructed to assess reference lists for relevance, balance, and scholarly necessity. The journal reserves the right to request the removal or justification of citations that are deemed excessive, irrelevant, or potentially manipulative.

Authors are responsible for ensuring that all cited works are directly relevant to their manuscript and that the reference list reflects a balanced and fair representation of the literature. Where clusters of citations to the same author or research group appear, authors may be asked to provide a clear academic justification.

Failure to comply with this policy may result in editorial actions, including requests for revision, manuscript rejection, post-publication correction, or other measures deemed appropriate by the Editor-in-Chief. This policy aligns with the ethical standards of COPE and best practices recommended by major indexing and abstracting services.

Authorship Policy

1. Principles

The journal adheres to internationally recognized standards of publication ethics, including the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Authorship confers both credit and accountability. All listed authors must have made a genuine intellectual contribution and must take public responsibility for the content of the work.

2. Authorship Criteria

To qualify as an author, an individual must meet all of the following four criteria:

  • Substantial scholarly contribution to at least one of: research concept or design; data acquisition; data analysis and interpretation.
  • Manuscript contribution: drafting the article, or critically revising it for important intellectual content.
  • Final approval of the version to be published.
  • Accountability for all aspects of the work, ensuring that questions related to accuracy or integrity are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Individuals who meet fewer than all four criteria must be listed in the Acknowledgments, not as authors.

3. Author Order

The order of authors should reflect the relative scholarly contribution to the work and must be agreed upon by all authors prior to submission.

The journal does not adjudicate contribution disputes.

Any authorship disagreement must be resolved by the authors' institution before submission.

4. Corresponding Author Responsibilities

The corresponding author is responsible for:

  • Ensuring all eligible contributors are listed as authors
  • Ensuring no ineligible individuals are included (guest/gift authorship)
  • Obtaining consent from all co-authors for submission and publication
  • Managing communication with the journal
  • Providing authorship contribution statements
  • Ensuring compliance with ethical standards

5. Prohibited Authorship Practices

The following are considered unethical:

5.1 Ghost Authorship — Excluding individuals who made qualifying contributions (e.g., students, statisticians, research staff).

5.2 Gift or Guest Authorship — Including individuals who did not meet authorship criteria (e.g., department heads, supervisors without intellectual contribution).

5.3 Honorary Authorship — Listing senior figures solely based on position or reputation.

Manuscripts found to involve such practices will be rejected.

6. Authorship of Student Thesis and Dissertation Work

For manuscripts derived wholly or partially from student theses, dissertations, or capstone projects:

  • The student must be listed as an author if they meet authorship criteria.
  • In most cases, the student should be the first author, particularly when: the data originate from the thesis; the student conducted the primary analysis; the manuscript is substantially based on the student's written work.
  • Supervisors may be listed as co-authors only if they meet full authorship criteria. General supervision, funding acquisition, or proofreading alone does not justify authorship.
  • Written consent from the student is required if the student is not the corresponding author, or if the thesis data are used in a multi-author publication.

Failure to include a qualifying student constitutes a serious ethical violation.

7. Group Authorship and Consortia

For large collaborative studies:

  • Group names may be listed as authors if all members meet authorship criteria
  • Individual contributions must be clearly specified
  • A guarantor author must be identified
  • Contributors who do not meet authorship criteria should be listed in a consortium appendix or acknowledgments

8. Equal Contribution Statements

If two or more authors contributed equally, this must be declared at submission and a contribution statement must specify the shared roles.

9. Deceased or Incapacitated Authors

A deceased or incapacitated individual may be listed as an author if they meet authorship criteria, their contribution is documented, and a co-author accepts responsibility for their contribution.

10. Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools

AI tools (e.g., large language models) cannot be listed as authors. Authors must:

  • Disclose the use of AI in writing, analysis, or figure generation
  • Take full responsibility for all AI-assisted content
  • Ensure no copyrighted or confidential material was improperly used

Failure to disclose AI use may result in rejection.

11. Author Contribution Statement

All submissions must include a detailed contribution statement specifying each author's role using a recognized taxonomy (e.g., conceptualization, methodology, data curation, writing – original draft, writing – review & editing).

12. Acknowledgments

The Acknowledgments section should include:

  • Individuals who provided technical, editorial, or administrative support
  • Funding sources
  • Institutional support
  • Thesis origin statement (if applicable)

Acknowledged individuals must provide permission to be named.

14. Authorship Disputes

The journal does not mediate authorship disputes. If a dispute arises:

  • The review process will be suspended
  • Authors will be referred to their institution for resolution
  • A decision will be made based on institutional findings

15. Ethical Violations and Sanctions

If authorship misconduct is confirmed, the journal may:

  • Reject the manuscript
  • Retract the published article
  • Notify the authors' institution
  • Ban the authors from future submissions for a defined period

16. Documentation Requirements

The journal may request at any time:

  • Signed authorship declaration forms
  • Contribution statements
  • Student consent forms for thesis-derived work
  • Institutional confirmation of authorship

Failure to provide documentation may result in rejection.

17. Post-Publication Authorship Corrections

Authorship corrections after publication require:

  • A formal corrigendum
  • Written consent from all authors
  • Editorial approval

Requests involving disputes will be referred to the authors' institution.

Authorship Changes Policy

The Journal of Sustainable Economies adheres to international publication ethics standards established by the ICMJE and COPE.

Authorship order must accurately reflect the relative contribution of each author and must be finalized before acceptance.

1. Before Submission

Authors may determine and revise the order of authorship prior to submission provided that:

  • All authors meet authorship criteria
  • All authors agree to the final order
  • No eligible contributor is omitted

No journal approval is required at this stage.

2. After Submission and Before Acceptance

Requests to change the order of authors, add an author, or remove an author after submission will be considered only if the following are provided:

  • A formal request from the corresponding author
  • A clear justification for the change
  • Written confirmation of agreement from all authors

The editorial office will not process any authorship change without unanimous written consent from all authors.

If an authorship dispute arises, the review process will be suspended until the matter is resolved by the authors' affiliated institutions. The journal does not adjudicate authorship disputes.

3. After Acceptance

Authorship changes will not be permitted after acceptance of a manuscript. This includes:

  • Reordering authors
  • Adding authors
  • Removing authors
  • Declaring equal contribution

Authors are responsible for ensuring that the author list and order are correct before the manuscript is accepted.

4. After Publication

Authorship changes will not be permitted after publication.

The journal will not issue corrigenda to modify the order of authors or to add/remove authors.

5. Responsibility of the Corresponding Author

The corresponding author must:

  • Confirm that all authors approve the final author order at submission and at acceptance
  • Ensure that no changes are requested after acceptance
  • Provide accurate authorship metadata

Failure to comply with this policy constitutes a breach of publication ethics and may result in rejection or retraction.

6. Metadata and Indexing

The author list and order published in the journal will be considered final and permanent and will be deposited with Crossref and indexing services without modification.

Post-acceptance

The Journal of Sustainable Economies supports the free availability of articles to the public. The journal encourages authors to post copies of their published articles in PDF format on their websites, blogs, or institutional repositories at any time. Whether distributed on the web or in printed form, JSE requests that author(s) refer to the journal's website via a hot link (see the Open Access Policy). The journal also offers a range of Creative Commons licenses (CC BY or CC BY-NC-ND).

Publication policies for the Journal of Sustainable Economies ensure that author(s) comply with public access requirements of major funding agencies around the world (SHERPA/RoMEO). However, it is the author(s)' responsibility to ensure compliance.

Ensuring the Right to Privacy – Human Subjects/Studies Review

The right to privacy must include individual research participants and others who were sources of information. Thus, it is very important that all research involving human subjects be submitted to and approved by the Human Subjects/Studies Organization or Committee within lead author(s)' organization. Compliance with this requirement must be stated in the manuscript. Such compliance is not required for conceptual manuscripts or empirical manuscripts that do not involve collection of data from human subjects. Please note that data collection from human subjects may involve qualitative (e.g., focus groups) or quantitative (e.g., cross-sectional surveys or experiments). Also, author(s) should check with the Human Subjects organization in the case of secondary data collected by third parties to determine whether review and approval are required. If author(s) decide that including identification information is important for scientific purposes, permission from their institution's Human Subjects/Studies Review organization or committee must be obtained. Furthermore, author(s) must disclose such information in a manner that is fully compliant with requirements set forth by the Human Subjects/Studies organization.

Use of Unpublished Data & Personal Communications

Author(s) can cite an accepted manuscript that has not yet been published on the JSE website. Note that, with the exception of Masters' theses, PhD dissertations, and university-affiliated "Working Papers," citations of unpublished data should not appear in the list of references. Author(s) should not cite personal correspondence unless necessary scientific information is provided and is not available in public sources. In such cases, the source and nature of the information resources should be declared and identified as personal correspondence in the reference section of the manuscript.

Plagiarism, Duplicate Publication and Scientific Misconduct

All articles submitted to the Journal of Sustainable Economies are reviewed to ensure the absence of plagiarism. Author(s) must guarantee that the submitted manuscript has not been previously published or under review for possible publication elsewhere. Author(s) are also required to certify that their work is original and does not contain substantially similar content from other publications.

JSE considers use of others' ideas or words that are protected as intellectual property, whether published or unpublished, without citation or permission, as scientific theft and misconduct. If such conduct is suspected, the person(s) involved will be asked to show that this did not occur, and in the event of failure to respond or respond satisfactorily, referral to the appropriate legal authority will occur. The publisher has the full right to act according to the decisions of the legal authority with the measures it deems appropriate, such as retraction or withdrawing the publication of the article if required.

In-house Production

Accepted manuscripts are processed for publication as rapidly as possible. Author(s) will be informed of post-acceptance stages such as professional copyediting and final proof review and approval. As part of this process, JSE will provide author(s) with specific target dates for initial publication.